ShiftDelete.Net Global

EliteBook 8 G1a 16 touchscreen model has major color accuracy tradeoff

Ana sayfa / Computers

The EliteBook 8 G1a 16 is HP’s latest business flagship, bringing a thinner design, modern ports, and the newest AMD Pro chips. But if you’re eyeing the touchscreen version, there’s one big drawback you might miss in the fine print: worse color performance.

While both touch and non-touch models feature a 1200p resolution, they don’t offer the same visual quality. The touchscreen configuration delivers just 63% sRGB coverage, compared to the full 100% sRGB on the non-touch model.

This isn’t a defect; HP lists it clearly in the spec sheet, but it’s easy to overlook. Most users won’t notice on paper, but in practice, the difference is clear. If you rely on accurate colors for creative work or editing, this matters.

Unless touch input is critical to your workflow, the non-touch EliteBook simply offers better visual fidelity. Full sRGB means:

In short, creators, avoid the touch version.

Beyond the screen, HP’s 2025 update introduces a thinner chassis, a more spacious keyboard, and a refined clickpad. USB-C port count has increased as well. And under the hood, you’ll find AMD’s new Zen 5-based Pro processors, giving a noticeable boost in multi-threaded tasks and energy efficiency.

Most laptops with both touch and non-touch options keep color profiles relatively close. HP’s split here is unusual and feels like a step back for the touchscreen crowd. It’s even more puzzling since both screens share the same resolution.

At first glance, these configurations seem nearly identical. But once you look past the surface, the EliteBook 8 G1a 16 touchscreen model introduces a hidden cost in display quality. It’s a quiet spec change, but for some users, a dealbreaker.

Yorum Ekleyin