The training processes of artificial intelligence giants such as OpenAI continue to be discussed. In the latest case between the New York Times and OpenAI, there were interesting developments. OpenAI claimed that “the system was hacked” with some questions asked to ChatGPT.
What is going on between OpenAI and the New York Times?
OpenAI has reached a critical point in its copyright dispute with the New York Times. The artificial intelligence giant accused the company of fabricating misleading evidence for the lawsuit. According to OpenAI, the New York Times collected misleading information by manipulating ChatGPT.
In a court filing in the copyright case, OpenAI said that some of the AI chat outputs the Times presented were not real. The company said the Times used “deceptive commands in clear violation of OpenAI’s terms of use” when interacting with chatbots, including ChatGPT.
The Apple Car project has been canceled. Information from key sources indicates that the team of 2,000 people has been disbanded.
OpenAI described this situation as a “hacking of their system”. However, the company did not explain how the Times breached this hacking attempt.
For those who don’t know, the New York Times sued OpenAI and its investor Microsoft in December. Accordingly, it used millions of the companies’ articles to train chatbots without permission. The lawsuit demands that the artificial intelligence training be characterized under copyright law.
In its response, OpenAI argued that the allegations in the Times’ complaint “do not meet journalistic standards.” It should be noted that OpenAI and New York Times representatives declined to comment on the allegations.
