Tensions are escalating between Spotify and Turkish authorities. The company, which the Competition Authority has launched a comprehensive investigation into on allegations of “discrimination and hindering competition,” has issued a radical signal through sources speaking to the British newspaper The Times. The company emphasized its opposition to censorship of user content and stated that although it is exploring ways to cooperate with Turkish authorities, it is also considering scenarios such as “ceasing its activities in the market or exiting Turkey entirely.”

The Spark That Ignited Tensions: Spotify Playlists That Contradict Values

The process was sparked by statements by Deputy Minister of Culture and Tourism Batuhan Mumcu. Mumcu argued that some playlists on the platform violated public beliefs and cultural values, stating, “This irresponsibility and lack of oversight, which disregards the sensitivities of our society, has now become a legal matter,” calling on the relevant authorities to take action.

Immediately following Mumcu’s statement, the Competition Authority announced that it had launched a formal investigation into Spotify. The Authority’s investigation goes beyond the cultural content debate and focuses on allegations that the company abused its market power. The following topics will be examined as part of the investigation:

• Obscuring the Activities of Competitors: Whether Spotify exploited its dominant market position to make it harder for other platforms.
• Discrimination Against Artists: Allegations that some artists and content creators were given increased visibility through algorithms.
• Unfair Distribution of Royalties: Whether unfair practices were employed in the distribution of royalties, thus violating the Law on the Protection of Competition.

Following these developments, Spotify adopted a more diplomatic tone in its official statement to the public. The company stated that it was aware of the Competition Authority’s investigation and would cooperate to reach a swift and constructive resolution, emphasizing that it was operating in compliance with the law.

However, this official and constructive stance, overshadowed by the leaked market withdrawal option to the international press, serves as a warning about the lengths the company will go in the face of potential censorship or sanctions that would restrict its operations. All eyes are now on the results of the Competition Authority’s investigation and the diplomatic contacts that will occur between the parties.