The Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Galaxy Z Fold 6, which were officially introduced and launched by Samsung last month, have received even greater interest than the South Korean technology giant expected. Samsung is already rolling up its sleeves for a thinner model of the Galaxy Z Fold 6. According to rumors, the name of the device has also been revealed.

Galaxy Z Fold 6 to be called ‘Special Edition’ with its thin version

For the past few months, there have been various rumors about a device that is thought to be Samsung’s thinnest foldable phone. This phone, which will compete with devices like the Honor Magic V3, is thought to be called ‘Slim’, but according to the latest information, this phone could be called ‘Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition’.

Samsung recently launched the Galaxy Z Fold 6 and it seems that users are generally happy with this device. However, there are serious criticisms that Samsung’s innovations in this series are not satisfactory.

While competitors like Honor are innovating in the foldable phone market, Samsung is said to be lagging behind in terms of innovation. With the Honor Magic V3 reaching the point that foldable phone manufacturers are aiming for, with its structure being almost as thin as a normal smartphone when folded, Samsung seems to have pushed its plans a little further.

The alaxy Z Fold 6 is a stylish device, but it has a rather thick structure. Although it is thinner than previous foldable phones, it is clearly a foldable phone when held in the hand. However, leaks about this new device, which will be released soon, indicate that it will be a thinner version of the device.

Evan Blass, a leaker close to Samsung, denied rumors that this device will be called ‘Galaxy Z Fold 6 Slim’ or ‘Galaxy Z Fold 6 Ultra’ in a post he made on the X platform. Instead, the device will appear as ‘Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition’.

It is currently unclear when Samsung will announce the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition and what features this device will come with. However, we are certain that a solution will be found to the thickness issue, which is the only point of criticism.