The EliteBook 8 G1a 16 is HP’s latest business flagship, bringing a thinner design, modern ports, and the newest AMD Pro chips. But if you’re eyeing the touchscreen version, there’s one big drawback you might miss in the fine print: worse color performance.
EliteBook 8 G1a 16 touchscreen cuts color range down to 63% sRGB
While both touch and non-touch models feature a 1200p resolution, they don’t offer the same visual quality. The touchscreen configuration delivers just 63% sRGB coverage, compared to the full 100% sRGB on the non-touch model.
This isn’t a defect; HP lists it clearly in the spec sheet, but it’s easy to overlook. Most users won’t notice on paper, but in practice, the difference is clear. If you rely on accurate colors for creative work or editing, this matters.
EliteBook 8 G1a 16 non-touch version is the better choice for creators
Unless touch input is critical to your workflow, the non-touch EliteBook simply offers better visual fidelity. Full sRGB means:
- More accurate image rendering
- Better gradient handling
- Closer match to real-world colors
- Improved display for media, design, and photo work
In short, creators, avoid the touch version.
What else is new with it?
Beyond the screen, HP’s 2025 update introduces a thinner chassis, a more spacious keyboard, and a refined clickpad. USB-C port count has increased as well. And under the hood, you’ll find AMD’s new Zen 5-based Pro processors, giving a noticeable boost in multi-threaded tasks and energy efficiency.
EliteBook 8 G1a 16 shows an odd design inconsistency
Most laptops with both touch and non-touch options keep color profiles relatively close. HP’s split here is unusual and feels like a step back for the touchscreen crowd. It’s even more puzzling since both screens share the same resolution.
Choose carefully: Its specs vary more than expected
At first glance, these configurations seem nearly identical. But once you look past the surface, the EliteBook 8 G1a 16 touchscreen model introduces a hidden cost in display quality. It’s a quiet spec change, but for some users, a dealbreaker.
